UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Do Practice Tests (Quizzes) Reduce or Provoke Test Anxiety? A Meta-Analytic Review

Yang, C; Li, J; Zhao, W; Luo, L; Shanks, DR; (2023) Do Practice Tests (Quizzes) Reduce or Provoke Test Anxiety? A Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review , 35 , Article 87. 10.1007/s10648-023-09801-w. Green open access

[thumbnail of Shanks_Frequent Tests & TA-R2.pdf]
Preview
Text
Shanks_Frequent Tests & TA-R2.pdf

Download (645kB) | Preview

Abstract

Practice testing is a powerful tool to consolidate long-term retention of studied information, facilitate subsequent learning of new information, and foster knowledge transfer. However, practitioners frequently express the concern that tests are anxiety-inducing and that their employment in the classroom should be minimized. The current review integrates results across 24 studies (i.e., 25 effects based on 3,374 participants) to determine the effect of practice tests (quizzes) on test anxiety (TA) and explore potential moderators of the effect. The results show strong Bayesian evidence (BF 10 > 25,000) that practice tests appreciably reduce TA to a medium extent (Hedges’ g = -0.52), with minimal evidence of publication bias. Easy practice tests tend to be more effective in mitigating TA than difficult ones. These findings support a recommendation for instructors to incorporate quizzes into their curriculum. However, instructors should be aware that quizzes themselves may be more stressful than other learning activities. Methods to make quizzes less stressful and more enjoyable are discussed. Research on the effect of practice tests on TA is still in its infancy, and future research directions are highlighted.

Type: Article
Title: Do Practice Tests (Quizzes) Reduce or Provoke Test Anxiety? A Meta-Analytic Review
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09801-w
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09801-w
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10177686
Downloads since deposit
5Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item