Kasaven, Lorraine S;
Jones, Benjamin P;
Heath, Carleen;
Odia, Rabi;
Green, Joycelia;
Petrie, Aviva;
Saso, Srdjan;
... Ben Nagi, Jara; + view all
(2022)
Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
, 306
pp. 1753-1760.
10.1007/s00404-022-06711-0.
Preview |
Text
Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation.pdf - Other Download (603kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Research question: To assess the relationship between the number of oocytes retrieved during elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) cycles with various clinical, biochemical, and radiological markers, including age, body mass index (BMI), baseline anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), Oestradiol level (E2) and total number of follicles ≥ 12 mm on the day of trigger. To also report the reproductive outcomes from women who underwent EOC. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 373 women embarking on EOC and autologous oocyte thaw cycles between 2008 and 2018 from a single London clinic in the United Kingdom. Results: 483 stimulation cycles were undertaken amongst 373 women. The median (range) age at cryopreservation was 38 (26–47) years old. The median numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle was 8 (0–37) and the median total oocytes cryopreserved per woman was 8 (0–45). BMI, E2 level and number of follicles ≥ 12 mm at trigger were all significant predictors of oocyte yield. Multivariate analysis confirmed there was no significant relationship between AFC or AMH, whilst on univariate analysis statistical significance was proven. Thirty six women returned to use their cryopreserved oocytes, of which there were 41 autologous oocyte thaw cycles undertaken. There were 12 successful livebirths achieved by 11 women. The overall livebirth rate was 26.8% per cycle. No livebirths were achieved in women who underwent EOC ≥ 40 years old, and 82% of all livebirths were achieved in women who had done so between 36 and 39 years old. Conclusion: Clinical, biochemical and radiological markers can predict oocyte yield in EOC cycles. Reproductive outcomes are more favourable when cryopreservation is performed before the age of 36, with lower success rates of livebirth observed in women aged 40 years and above.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation |
Location: | Germany |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00404-022-06711-0 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06711-0 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Keywords: | Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Anti-Mullerian hormone, Fertility preservation, Elective oocyte cryopreservation, Vitrification, Livebirth rate, OVARIAN STIMULATION, FERTILITY, IMPACT, WOMEN, IVF, AGE, EXPERIENCE, PREDICTOR, CYCLES, AMH |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10175605 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |