Wiliam, Dylan;
(2019)
Why Formative Assessment is Always both Domain-general and Domain-specific and What Matters is the Balance between the Two.
In: Andrade, Heidi L and Bennett, Randy E and Cizek, Gregory J, (eds.)
Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines.
Routledge: New York, NY.
Preview |
Text
Wiliam_Why assessment is always both domain-general and domain-specific and what matters is the balance between the two (Andrade et al 2019).pdf Download (286kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This chapter suggests that the best answer to the question of the domain-specificity of formative assessment is that formative assessment is irreducibly both domain-specific and domain-general, as implemented in the King’s-Medway-Oxfordshire Formative Assessment Project. It deals with a report of a large-scale randomized controlled trial of a generic approach to formative assessment that produced significant increases in student achievement at minimal cost. The chapter shows that the optimal approach to using formative assessment to improve student achievement at scale has to recognize that formative assessment is both domain-general and domain-specific. Given the reasonably clear evidence about the effectiveness of formative assessment to raise student achievement even where such achievement is measured through standardized tests, anything that dissuades teachers from embracing formative assessment because of the restrictions applied is, in effect, a way of lowering student achievement. The chapter also presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this book.
Type: | Book chapter |
---|---|
Title: | Why Formative Assessment is Always both Domain-general and Domain-specific and What Matters is the Balance between the Two |
ISBN: | 1138054348 |
ISBN-13: | 9781315166933 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.4324/9781315166933 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author-accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10173078 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |