Gorse, Denise;
Goel, Akshat;
(2022)
Deep vs. Shallow Learning: A Benchmark Study in Low Magnitude Earthquake Detection.
In:
83rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2022.
(pp. pp. 1-5).
European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers: Houten, Netherlands.
Preview |
Text
2205.00525.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
While deep learning models have seen recent high uptake in the geosciences, and are appealing in their ability to learn from minimally processed input data, as ’black box’ models they do not provide an easy means to understand how a decision is reached, which in safety-critical tasks especially can be problematical. An alternative route is to use simpler, more transparent ’white box’ models, in which task-specific feature construction replaces the more opaque feature discovery process performed automatically within deep learning models. Using data from the Groningen Gas Field in the Netherlands, we build on an existing logistic regression model by the addition of four further features discovered using elastic net driven data mining within the catch22 time series analysis package. We then evaluate the performance of the augmented logistic regression model relative to a deep (CNN) model, pre-trained on the Groningen data, on progressively increasing noise-tosignal ratios. We discover that, for each ratio, our logistic regression model correctly detects every earthquake, while the deep model fails to detect nearly 20 % of seismic events, thus justifying at least a degree of caution in the application of deep models, especially to data with higher noise-to-signal ratios.
Type: | Proceedings paper |
---|---|
Title: | Deep vs. Shallow Learning: A Benchmark Study in Low Magnitude Earthquake Detection |
Event: | 83rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2022 |
ISBN-13: | 9781713859314 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author-accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Seismology · Machine learning · Feature selection · Benchmark study |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10172669 |




Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |