UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Investigating (sequential) unit asking: An unsuccessful quest for scope sensitivity in willingness to donate judgments

Maier, maximilian; Caviola, Lucius; Schubert, Stefan; Harris, Adam JL; (2023) Investigating (sequential) unit asking: An unsuccessful quest for scope sensitivity in willingness to donate judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 36 (4) , Article e2335. 10.1002/bdm.2335. Green open access

[thumbnail of Harris_Behavioral Decision Making - 2023 - Maier - Investigating  sequential  unit asking  An unsuccessful quest for scope.pdf]
Preview
Text
Harris_Behavioral Decision Making - 2023 - Maier - Investigating sequential unit asking An unsuccessful quest for scope.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

People exhibit scope insensitivity: Their expressed valuation of a problem is not proportionate with its scope or size. To address scope insensitivity in charitable giving, Hsee et al. (2013) developed the (Classical) Unit Asking technique, where people are first asked how much they are willing to donate to support a single individual, followed by how much they are willing to donate to support a group of individuals. In this paper, we explored the mechanisms, extensions, and limitations of the technique. In particular, we investigated an extension of the technique, which we call Sequential Unit Asking (SUA). SUA asks people a series of willingness-to-donate questions, in which the number of individuals to be helped increases in a stepwise manner until it reaches the total group size. Across four studies investigating donation judgments (total N¼2045), we did not find evidence that willingness to donate (WTD) judgments to the total group increased with larger groups. Instead, our results suggest that Unit Asking (sequential or classical) increases donation amounts only through a single one-off boost. Further, we find evidence in three out of four studies that the SUA extension increases WTD judgments over Classical Unit Asking. In a fifth study (N¼537) using a contingent valuation design (instead of donation judgments), we find scope sensitivity using all asking techniques. We conclude that, while it is difficult to create scope sensitivity in WTD judgments, SUA should be considered a promising approach to increase charitable donations.

Type: Article
Title: Investigating (sequential) unit asking: An unsuccessful quest for scope sensitivity in willingness to donate judgments
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2335
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2335
Language: English
Additional information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: Boosting, charitable giving, judgment and decision making, scope insensitivity, unit asking
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10169859
Downloads since deposit
41Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item