Rossant, C;
Brook, C;
(2023)
Why admitted cases of AHT make a low quality reference standard: A survey of people accused of AHT in France.
Forensic Science International: Synergy
, 6
, Article 100312. 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100312.
Preview |
PDF
1-s2.0-S2589871X22000973-main.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Several influential articles that attempt to establish diagnostic methods for Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) use admitted cases as a reference standard. This study analyses a survey of people accused of AHT in France, to understand the environment and situations in which such admissions are made. Multiple reasons to question the reliability of admissions to AHT are demonstrated in the responses, including reduced sentences, the return of children to the family home, a desire to stop accusations being leveled at a partner and for legal proceedings to end. These factors must be considered in the context of proceedings that are long, expensive and stressful, leading to depression and financial hardship, and that seem to be inevitably heading towards conviction. The ineluctable conclusion is that admitted cases do not make a suitably reliable reference standard for undertaking scientific investigation, or for validating the diagnostic methods used for AHT.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
