UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Evaluating Effect of Block Size in Compressed Sensing for Grayscale Images

Hashmi, Muhammad Abdur Rehman; Raza, Rana Hammad; (2018) Evaluating Effect of Block Size in Compressed Sensing for Grayscale Images. In: 2017 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT). (pp. pp. 149-154). IEEE: Islamabad, Pakistan. Green open access

[thumbnail of Hashmi_Evaluating_Effect_of_Block_Size_in_Compressed_Sensing_for_Grayscale_Images..pdf]
Preview
Text
Hashmi_Evaluating_Effect_of_Block_Size_in_Compressed_Sensing_for_Grayscale_Images..pdf

Download (150kB) | Preview

Abstract

Compressed sensing is an evolving methodology that enables sampling at sub-Nyquist rates and still provides decent signal reconstruction. During the last decade, the reported works have suggested to improve time efficiency by adopting Block based Compressed Sensing (BCS) and reconstruction performance improvement through new algorithms. A trade-off is required between the time efficiency and reconstruction quality. In this paper we have evaluated the significance of block size in BCS to improve reconstruction performance for grayscale images. A parameter variant of BCS [15] based sampling followed by reconstruction through Smoothed Projected Landweber (SPL) technique [16] involving use of Weiner smoothing filter and iterative hard thresholding is applied in this paper. The BCS variant is used to evaluate the effect of block size on image reconstruction quality by carrying out extensive testing on 9200 images acquired from online resources provided by Caltech101 [6], University of Granada [7] and Florida State University [8]. The experimentation showed some consistent results which can improve reconstruction performance in all BCS frameworks including BCS-SPL [17] and its variants [19], [27]. Firstly, the effect of varying block size (4x4, 8x8, 16x16, 32x32 and 64x64) results in changing the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) of reconstructed images from at least 1 dB to a maximum of 16 dB. This challenges the common notion that bigger block sizes always result in better reconstruction performance. Secondly, the variation in reconstruction quality with changing block size is mostly dependent on the image visual contents. Thirdly, images having similar visual contents, irrespective of the size, e.g., those from the same category of Caltech101 [6] gave majority vote for the same Optimum Block Size (OBS). These focused notes may help improve BCS based image capturing at many of the existing applications. For example, experimental results suggest using block size of 8x8 or 16x16 to capture facial identity using BCS. Fourthly, the average processing time taken for BCS and reconstruction through SPL with Lapped transform of Discrete Cosine Transform as the sparifying basis remained 300 milli-seconds for block size of 4x4 to 5 seconds for block size of 64x64. Since the processing time variation remains less than 5 seconds, selecting the OBS may not affect the time constraint in many applications. Analysis reveals that no particular block size is able to provide optimum reconstruction for all images with varying nature of visual contents. Therefore, the selection of block size should be made specific to the particular type of application images depending upon their visual contents.

Type: Proceedings paper
Title: Evaluating Effect of Block Size in Compressed Sensing for Grayscale Images
Event: 2017 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT)
Dates: 18 Dec 2017 - 20 Dec 2017
ISBN-13: 978-1-5386-3567-4
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1109/fit.2017.00034
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1109/fit.2017.00034
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Image reconstruction; Matching pursuit algorithms; Compressed sensing; Transforms; Sensors; Minimization; PSNR
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Engineering Science Faculty Office
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10162594
Downloads since deposit
6Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item