Dsouza, Mark;
(2020)
Deception, Consent to Sex, and R v Lawrance (Part 2).
[Digital scholarly resource].
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/criminal-law/news/2020/aug/d...
Preview |
Text
blogpost_part_2.pdf - Published Version Download (217kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I suggest that we replace the CACD’s rule with a ‘Disjunctive Approach’ to deciding when false premises vitiate consent. I argue that this Disjunctive Approach adequately protects sexual autonomy in a manner that is compatible with the words of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and the liability outcomes of (the vast majority of) the cases applying it.
Type: | Digital scholarly resource |
---|---|
Title: | Deception, Consent to Sex, and R v Lawrance (Part 2) |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | https://www.ucl.ac.uk/criminal-law/news/2020/aug/d... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Deception, consent, sexual offences, R v Lawrance |
UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10158186 |
Downloads since deposit
Loading...
273DownloadsDownload activity - last month
Loading...
Download activity - last 12 months
Loading...
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Loading...
Archive Staff Only
View Item |