Bui, Tan; Picone, Dean S; Schultz, Martin G; Armstrong, Matthew K; Peng, Xiaoqing; Black, J Andrew; Dwyer, Nathan; ... Sharman, James E; + view all Bui, Tan; Picone, Dean S; Schultz, Martin G; Armstrong, Matthew K; Peng, Xiaoqing; Black, J Andrew; Dwyer, Nathan; Roberts-Thomson, Philip; Adams, Heath; Hughes, Alun D; Sharman, James E; - view fewer (2022) Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification. Journal of Hypertension , 40 (10) pp. 2037-2044. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003228.

Preview

Text Comparison between cuff-based Bui etal.pdf - Accepted Version Download (742kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective:Accurate measurement of central blood pressure (BP) using upper arm cuff-based methods is associated with several factors, including determining the level of systolic BP (SBP) amplification. This study aimed to determine the agreement between cuff-based and invasively measured SBP amplification.Methods:Patients undergoing coronary angiography had invasive SBP amplification (brachial SBP - central SBP) measured simultaneously with cuff-based SBP amplification using a commercially available central BP device (device 1: Sphygmocor Xcel; n = 171, 70% men, 60 ± 10 years) and a now superseded model of a central BP device (device 2: Uscom BP+; n = 52, 83% men, 62 ± 10 years).Results:Mean difference (±2SD, limits of agreement) between cuff-based and invasive SBP amplification was 4 mmHg (-12, +20 mmHg, P < 0.001) for device 1 and -2 mmHg (-14, +10 mmHg, P = 0.10) for device 2. Both devices systematically overestimated SBP amplification at lower levels and underestimated at higher levels of invasive SBP amplification, but with stronger bias for device 1 (r = -0.68 vs. r = -0.52; Z = 2.72; P = 0.008). Concordance of cuff-based and invasive SBP amplification across quartiles of invasive SBP amplification was low, particularly in the lowest and highest quartiles. The root mean square errors from regression between cuff-based central SBP and brachial SBP were significantly lower (indicating less variability) than from invasive regression models (P < 0.001).Conclusions:Irrespective of the difference from invasive measurements, cuff-based estimates of SBP amplification showed evidence of proportional systematic bias and had less individual variability. These observations could provide insights on how to improve the performance of cuff-based central BP.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item