UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Judgments of ethically questionable financial practices: a new perspective

Sobolev, Daphne; Clunie, James; (2022) Judgments of ethically questionable financial practices: a new perspective. Review of Behavioral Finance , 15 (3) 292 -308. 10.1108/RBF-09-2021-0185. Green open access

[thumbnail of Sobolev_Perspective paper (for UCL repository) 16_08_2022.pdf]
Preview
Text
Sobolev_Perspective paper (for UCL repository) 16_08_2022.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (397kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose: Research has suggested that ethics judgments should be made from an impartial perspective. However, people are often partial about their money. This study aims to investigate the extent to which perspectives – the perspective of those who can gain from the use of a financial practice and the perspective of those who can incur losses due to it – affect lay people’s ethics and legality judgments of the practice. In addition, it asks which factors influence their investment intentions. / Design/methodology/approach: The study uses a between-participant scenario experiment, in which participants are presented with cases of predatory trading and front running. Each participant is asked to take either a gain or loss perspective through the formulation of the presented cases. Subsequently, all participants make ethics, legality and investment intention judgments. / Findings: The authors establish that perspectives significantly affect people’s ethics judgments and, to a lesser extent, their legality judgments. People’s investment intentions depend on their perspectives, too, as well as on their financial considerations, ethics judgments, legality judgments and trust. / Originality/value: Research has focused on relatively stable determinants of people’s ethics judgments of financial practices. This paper shows that the situational prospect of profit can sway lay people’s judgments. When people take the gain perspective, they judge financial practices to be more ethical than when they take the loss perspective. Furthermore, people’s perspectives can distort their legality judgments and influence their investment intentions.

Type: Article
Title: Judgments of ethically questionable financial practices: a new perspective
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1108/RBF-09-2021-0185
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-09-2021-0185
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Ethics judgment, Legal judgment, Perspective taking, Predatory trading, Front running
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > UCL School of Management
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10153931
Downloads since deposit
68Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item