UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks: evidence from randomized online experiments

Stoffel, Sandro T; Hvalica Coldwell, Ana; von Wagner, Christian; Herrmann, Benedikt; (2022) Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks: evidence from randomized online experiments. Psychology, Health & Medicine 10.1080/13548506.2022.2061716. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of von Wagner_Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks_AOP.pdf]
Preview
Text
von Wagner_Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks_AOP.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Low perceived risk of is associated with a low probability of engaging in risk preventive behaviours. Temporal framing has been suggested to make the risk seem higher, as narrower time frames appear to increase perceived risk and intentions to engage in risk-preventive behaviours. In two online experiments, we tested how manipulating risk information about colorectal cancer (CRC) influenced risk perception and preventive behaviours. 902 men and women aged 45–54 were recruited from an English online panel. Study 1 (N = 132) investigated how communicating CRC mortality instead of incidence rates influences risk perception, using both yearly and daily frames. In study 2 (N = 770), CRC incidence was described as occurring yearly, daily or hourly. The primary outcome measures were risk perception, intention to engage in preventive behaviours and whether participants chose to read information about ways to reduce CRC risk or skip it to finish the survey. Study 1 did not find a difference in intentions based on information about the risk of developing vs the risk of dying of CRC. Study 2 found that, while communicating CRC incidence occurring as every day increased information-seeking behaviour compared to every year and every hour (57.4% vs 45.9% vs 45.6%, p = 0.012), individuals in the daily condition were less likely to get all comprehension questions right (69.9% vs 78.2% vs 85.0%, respectively, p = 0.015). Temporal framing had no impact on perceived risk or intentions to engage in risk-reducing behaviours. While manipulating risk information in terms of temporal framing did not increase perceived risk, it may influence people’s decision to engage with the information in the first place.

Type: Article
Title: Testing temporal frames of colorectal cancer risks: evidence from randomized online experiments
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2061716
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2022.2061716
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2022 European Union. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, decision making, online experiment, risk communication, temporal framing
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10149812
Downloads since deposit
47Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item