UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

‘Should We Be Doing It, Should We Not Be Doing It, Who Could Be Harmed?’

Garrecht, Carola; Czinczel, Berrit; Kretschmann, Marek; Reiss, Michael J; (2022) ‘Should We Be Doing It, Should We Not Be Doing It, Who Could Be Harmed?’. Science & Education 10.1007/s11191-022-00342-2. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Reiss__ShouldWeBeDoingItShouldWeNotBe.pdf]
Preview
Text
Reiss__ShouldWeBeDoingItShouldWeNotBe.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Many science educators have argued in favour of including socioscientific issues (SSI) in general, and ethical issues in particular, in school science. However, there have been a number of objections to this proposal, and it is widely acknowledged that such teaching places additional demands on science teachers. This study examined the curricula, textbooks and views of both student teachers and established teachers in England and in Germany regarding the teaching of ethical issues in secondary school science, particularly the ethical issues surrounding animal tests. Analysis of the curriculum documents for secondary or upper secondary school science showed that in both countries, ethical considerations feature strongly. However, in both countries, the overall treatments in the school textbooks of the ethical issues of animal testing were generally ‘thin’, and little opportunity was given for students to consider different ethical frameworks. The teacher and student teacher interviews revealed that interviewees generally gave ethical issues less emphasis than fundamental science. A number of interviewees referred to a lack of appropriate teaching material, and many of them also had concerns that such teaching could give rise to classroom management issues or that they might be accused of indoctrinating their students. Given the increasing acknowledgement of the need for school science to address so-called wicked socioscientific problems, these findings are a concern. We end with recommendations for curricula, for textbooks and for teacher education.

Type: Article
Title: ‘Should We Be Doing It, Should We Not Be Doing It, Who Could Be Harmed?’
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-022-00342-2
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00342-2
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10149569
Downloads since deposit
149Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item