UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Bill Hillier, Christopher Alexander and the representation of urban complexity: their concepts of ‘pervasive centrality’ and ‘field of centres’ brought into dialogue

Davis, Howard; Griffiths, Sam; (2022) Bill Hillier, Christopher Alexander and the representation of urban complexity: their concepts of ‘pervasive centrality’ and ‘field of centres’ brought into dialogue. In: de Koning, Remco, (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th International Space Syntax Symposium. (pp. pp. 1-19). Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL) Green open access

[thumbnail of Griffiths_davisGriffiths_sss13_depositIris_2022.pdf]
Preview
Text
Griffiths_davisGriffiths_sss13_depositIris_2022.pdf

Download (785kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper draws attention to what we propose as a shared sensibility towards the life of cities in the work of Christopher Alexander and Bill Hillier. Specifically, it reflects on some similarities in their conceptions of urban centrality, while also acknowledging their very different intellectual trajectories. A consideration is how both men grounded their theoretical and analytical insights in their personal experience of cities. Alexander’s emphasis on detailed multimodal observation and awareness as a source of design understanding is writ large throughout his many publications. The same could hardly be said of Hillier who consistently prioritized the configurational modelling of urban form. Yet those familiar with Hillier’s teaching and design practice know how his analytical understanding drew on a deep knowledge of cities worldwide. For Hillier space syntax models were not simply outputs of a computational process but a stage in his ongoing dialogue with real places. Direct points of contact between Alexander and Hillier are few. Hillier’s engagement with Alexander in Space is the Machine (1996) takes issue with the inductive epistemology in Notes on the Synthesis of Form (1964), while Hillier (2009) refers approvingly to Alexander’s critique of the modernist city in ‘A city is not a tree’ (1965). Conversely, in The Nature of Order, Alexander makes brief but positive reference to Hillier and Hanson’s analysis of ‘G’ in The Social Logic of Space (1984). This paper concludes by explaining why the connection of Alexander and Hillier, two of the great urban thinkers of last half-century, is worth developing further.

Type: Proceedings paper
Title: Bill Hillier, Christopher Alexander and the representation of urban complexity: their concepts of ‘pervasive centrality’ and ‘field of centres’ brought into dialogue
Event: The 13th International Space Syntax Symposium
Location: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL).
Dates: 20th-24th June 2022
ISBN-13: 978-82-93677-67-3
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Publisher version: https://www.hvl.no/en/research/conference/13sss/pr...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Bill Hillier, Christopher Alexander, urban centrality, ervasive centrality, field of centres
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > The Bartlett School of Architecture
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10148515
Downloads since deposit
106Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item