UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Altruism or nationalism? Exploring global discourses of medical school regulation

Rashid, Mohammed Ahmed; (2022) Altruism or nationalism? Exploring global discourses of medical school regulation. Medical Education 10.1111/medu.14804. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Medical Education - 2022 - Rashid - Altruism or nationalism  Exploring global discourses of medical school regulation.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Medical Education - 2022 - Rashid - Altruism or nationalism Exploring global discourses of medical school regulation.pdf - Published Version

Download (141kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although medical school regulation is ubiquitous, the extent to which it should be based on global principles is unclear. In 2010, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) announced that from 2023, overseas doctors would only be eligible for certification to practise in the United States if they had graduated from a medical school that was accredited by a 'recognised' agency. This policy empowered the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) to create a recognition programme for regulatory agencies around the world, despite a lack of empirical evidence to support medical school regulation. METHODS: This study employs critical discourse analysis, drawing on the theoretical perspectives of Michel Foucault and Edward Said, to identify discourses that enabled this 'globalising' policy decision to take place. The dataset includes a series of 250 documents gathered around three key events: the Edinburgh declaration by WFME in 1988, the first set of global standards for medical schools by WFME in 2003 and the ECFMG ruling about medical school accreditation in 2010. FINDINGS: Two discourses, endorsement and modernisation, were dominant throughout this entire period and framed the move to globalise medical school regulation in terms of altruism and improving medical education worldwide. A discourse of resistance was present in the earlier period of this study but faded away as WFME aligned itself with ECFMG after 2010. Two further discourses, protection and control, emerged in the later period of this study and framed the ECFMG ruling in terms of nationalism and protecting American interests. DISCUSSION: This study proposes a new conceptualisation of the relationship between ECFMG and WFME in light of the apparently contradictory policy motivations of altruism and nationalism. It goes on to consider the implications of this association for the legitimacy of WFME as an organisation that represents all of the world's medical schools.

Type: Article
Title: Altruism or nationalism? Exploring global discourses of medical school regulation
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/medu.14804
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14804
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 The Author. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > UCL Medical School
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10147057
Downloads since deposit
141Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item