von Peter, S; Bergstrøm, T; Nenoff-Herchenbach, I; Hopfenbeck, MS; Pocobello, R; Aderhold, V; Alvarez-Monjaras, M; ... Heumann, K; + view all von Peter, S; Bergstrøm, T; Nenoff-Herchenbach, I; Hopfenbeck, MS; Pocobello, R; Aderhold, V; Alvarez-Monjaras, M; Seikkula, J; Heumann, K; - view fewer (2021) Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach. Frontiers in Sociology , 6 , Article 806437. 10.3389/fsoc.2021.806437.

Preview

Text Alvarez Monjaras_Peter_et_al-2021-Frontiers_in_Sociology.pdf - Published Version Download (622kB) | Preview

Abstract

In recent decades, the use of psychosocial and psychiatric care systems has increased worldwide. A recent article proposed the concept of psychiatrization as an explanatory framework, describing multiple processes responsible for the spread of psychiatric concepts and forms of treatment. This article aims to explore the potentials of the Open Dialogue (OD) approach for engaging in less psychiatrizing forms of psychosocial support. While OD may not be an all-encompassing solution to de-psychiatrization, this paper refers to previous research showing that OD has the potential to 1) limit the use of neuroleptics, 2), reduce the incidences of mental health problems and 3) decrease the use of psychiatric services. It substantiates these potentials to de-psychiatrize psychosocial support by exploring the OD’s internal logic, its use of language, its processes of meaning-making, its notion of professionalism, its promotion of dialogue and how OD is set up structurally. The conclusion touches upon the dangers of co-optation, formalization and universalization of the OD approach and stresses the need for more societal, layperson competencies in dealing with psychosocial crises.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item