UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Who is the Practitioner in Faculty-Staff Sexual Misconduct Work?: Views from the UK and US

Coy, M; Bull, A; Libarkin, J; Page, T; (2022) Who is the Practitioner in Faculty-Staff Sexual Misconduct Work?: Views from the UK and US. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 37 (17-18) NP14996-NP15019. 10.1177/08862605221106189. Green open access

[thumbnail of Page_Who is the Practitioner revised December 2021.pdf]
Preview
Text
Page_Who is the Practitioner revised December 2021.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (292kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article maps and compares four universities’ policies and procedures for addressing faculty and staff sexual misconduct in higher education in the UK and US. While universities have engaged in significant work to grapple with student-student sexual misconduct, attention to misconduct perpetrated, and experienced, by higher education employees is relatively nascent. In this paper, we explore the maze of institutional processes and actors that victim-survivors of FASSM might encounter. We describe what is known about prevalence of FASSM in the US and UK and offer an overview of the policy landscape in both settings. Inspired by Patricia Yancey Martin, we analyze publicly available policy documents on FASSM from two US and two UK universities and map out visually the range of investigative, reporting, and sanctioning processes. We introduce an analytic distinction between an actor and a practitioner within the FASSM context, whereby actors are those tasked with administrative duties in handling sexual misconduct reports, while practitioners are those with specialized knowledge and training that enables them to prioritize victim-survivor needs. These illustrative diagrams suggest that while university employees are tasked to act on reports and disclosures of sexual misconduct, it is difficult to identify specialist practitioners with expertise to support victim-survivors of FASSM. Ultimately, this work provides a deeper understanding of what practice looks like in relation to higher education FASSM, and we outline implications for future research directions.

Type: Article
Title: Who is the Practitioner in Faculty-Staff Sexual Misconduct Work?: Views from the UK and US
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/08862605221106189
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221106189
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Education, Practice and Society
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10141052
Downloads since deposit
92Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item