Greenburgh, A;
Liefgreen, A;
Bell, V;
Raihani, N;
(2021)
Factors affecting conspiracy theory endorsement in paranoia.
PsyArXiv Preprints: Ithaca, NY, USA.
Preview |
Text
Greenburgh_pre-print CT.pdf Download (857kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Paranoia and conspiracy thinking are known to be distinct but correlated constructs, but it is unknown whether certain types of conspiracy thinking are more common in paranoia than others. In a large (n=1000), pre-registered online study we tested if endorsement of items on a new Components of Conspiracy Ideation Questionnaire varied according to a) whether harm was described as being intentional, and b) whether they were self-referential. Our predictions were supported: paranoia was positively associated with endorsement of items on this questionnaire overall and more paranoid individuals were more likely to endorse items describing intentional and self-referential harm. Belief in one item on the Components of Conspiracy Ideation Questionnaire was associated with belief in others and items describing incidental harm and harm to others were found to be more believable overall. Individuals who endorsed conspiracy theory items on the questionnaire were more likely to state that people similar to them would as well, although, counter to our expectations, this effect was not reduced in paranoia.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
