UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The impact of assisted reproductive technology treatments on maternal and offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A review of systematic reviews

Melville, J; Stringer, A; Black, N; Quenby, S; Keay, SD; David, AL; Yasmin, E; (2021) The impact of assisted reproductive technology treatments on maternal and offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A review of systematic reviews. F&S Reviews , 2 (4) pp. 287-301. 10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.09.003. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S2666571921000207-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S2666571921000207-main.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments are commonly used to aid conception in subfertile couples. We aimed to evaluate the risks of adverse maternal and offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancy conceived with different ART treatments and techniques. / Evidence review: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and HTA until December 2020 for all systematic reviews evaluating adverse outcomes in pregnancies conceived with various ART techniques, autologous or donor gametes, and embryo development stages. We assessed review quality using the AMSTAR2 tool risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) from the top quality reviews for each of the outcomes of interest across the identified ART treatments and population subgroups. / Results: We included 24 systematic reviews, most reported on observational studies. Compared to spontaneous conception, ART pregnancies had a higher risk of placenta previa (PP) (RR 3.71, 95%CI 2.67-5.16), antepartum haemorrhage (APH) (RR 2.11, 95%CI 1.86-2.38), preterm birth (PTB) (RR 1.71, 95%CI 1.59-1.83), very preterm birth (VPTB) (RR 2.12, 95%CI 1.73-2.59), small for gestational age (SGA) (RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.20-1.52), low birthweight (LBW) (RR 1.61, 95%CI 1.49-1.75) and very low birthweight (VLBW) (RR 2.12, 95%CI 1.84-2.43). Frozen vs fresh embryo transfer was associated with a lower risk for PTB (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.84-0.97), SGA (RR 0.61, 95%CI 0.56-0.67), LBW (RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.67-0.77) and VLBW (RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.69–0.82). Embryo transfer at blastocyst vs cleavage showed higher risk for PTB (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.20) and large for gestational age (LGA) (RR 1.12, 95%CI 1.03-1.21) with lower risk for SGA (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.92). Using donor vs autologous oocytes increased the odds of PTB (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.33-1.86), LBW (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.10-3.41) and VLBW (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.22–1.54) as well as maternal complications (postpartum haemorrhage OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.20-3.20, gestational diabetes OR 1.27 95%CI 1.03-1.56, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy OR 2.63, 95%CI 2.17-3.18, and caesarean section OR 2.28, 95%CI 2.14-2.42). / Conclusions: ART treatments are associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and offspring outcomes, especially with donor oocytes. The characteristics of ART treatment should be incorporated into prenatal care planning to mitigate those risks.

Type: Article
Title: The impact of assisted reproductive technology treatments on maternal and offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A review of systematic reviews
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.09.003
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.09.003
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: in-vitro fertilisation, pregnancy, maternity, assisted conception, antenatal, intrapartum, offspring, systematic review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health > Maternal and Fetal Medicine
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10134959
Downloads since deposit
62Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item