Becchetti, L;
Candio, P;
Salustri, F;
(2021)
Vaccine uptake and constrained decision making: The case of Covid-19.
Social Science & Medicine
, 289
, Article 114410. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114410.
Preview |
Text
1-s2.0-S0277953621007425-main.pdf - Accepted Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Policy makers require support in conceptualizing and assessing the impact that vaccination policies can have on the proportion of the population being vaccinated against COVID-19. To this purpose, we propose a behavioural economics-based framework to model vaccination choices. We calibrate our model using up-to-date surveys on people attitudes toward vaccination as well as estimates of COVID-19 infection and mortality rates and vaccine efficacy for the UK population. Our findings show that vaccine campaigns hardly reach herd immunity if the sceptics have real-time information on the proportion of the population being vaccinated and the negationists do not change their attitudes toward vaccination. Based on our results, we discuss the main implications of the model's application in the context of nudging and voluntariness versus mandatory rule-based policies.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Vaccine uptake and constrained decision making: The case of Covid-19 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114410 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114410 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Vaccine campaign, COVID-19, Decision making, Health beliefs, Nudging, Public health, United Kingdom |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute for Global Health |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10134796 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |