UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Do Additional Testing Locations Improve the Detection of Macular Perimetric Defects in Glaucoma?

Montesano, G; McKendrick, AM; Turpin, A; Brusini, P; Oddone, F; Fogagnolo, P; Perdicchi, A; ... Crabb, DP; + view all (2021) Do Additional Testing Locations Improve the Detection of Macular Perimetric Defects in Glaucoma? Ophthalmology , 128 (12) pp. 1722-1735. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.06.012. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0161642021004565-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0161642021004565-main.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: to evaluate the ability of additional central testing locations to improve detection of macular visual field (VF) defects in glaucoma. DESIGN: prospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 440 healthy people and 499 patients with Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy (GON) were tested with a fundus tracked perimeter (CMP, CenterVue, Italy) using a 24-2 grid with 12 additional macular locations (24-2+). METHODS: GON was identified based on expert evaluation of optic nerve head photographs and optical coherence tomography scans, independently of the visual field (VF). We defined macular defects as locations with measurements outside the 5% and 2% normative limits on Total Deviation (TD) and Pattern Deviation (PD) maps within the VF central 10 degrees. Classification was based on the total number of affected macular locations (overall detection) or on the largest number of affected macular locations connected in a contiguous cluster (cluster detection). Criteria based on the number of locations and cluster size were used to obtain equivalent specificity between the 24-2 and the 24-2+, calculated using false detections in the healthy cohort. Partial Areas Under the detection Curve (pAUCs) were also compared at specificities ≥ 95%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: matched specificity comparison of the ability to detect glaucomatous macular defects between the 24-2 and 24-2+ grids. RESULTS: at matched specificity, cluster detection identified more macular defects with the 24-2+ compared to the 24-2. For example, the mean (95% confidence interval) increase in percentage of detection was 8 (5, 11)% and 10 (7, 13)% for TD-5% and PD-5% maps, respectively, and 5 (2, 7)% and 6 (4, 8)% for the TD-2% and PD-2% maps respectively. There was good agreement between the two grids. The improvement measured by pAUCs was also significant, but generally small. The percentage of eyes with macular defects ranged from 30 to 50%. Test time for the 24-2+ was longer (21% increase). Between 74% and 98% of defects missed by the 24-2 had at least one location with sensitivity < 20 dB, CONCLUSIONS: VF examinations with additional macular locations can modestly improve the detection of macular defects in GON without loss of specificity when appropriate criteria are selected.

Type: Article
Title: Do Additional Testing Locations Improve the Detection of Macular Perimetric Defects in Glaucoma?
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.06.012
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.06.012
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: Glaucoma, Macula, Perimetry, Visual field
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10130920
Downloads since deposit
69Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item