Stokes, F;
Acquaviva-Bourdain, C;
Hoppe, B;
Lieske, JC;
Lindner, E;
Toulson, G;
Vaz, FM;
(2020)
Plasma oxalate: comparison of methodologies.
Urolithiasis
, 48
pp. 473-480.
10.1007/s00240-020-01197-4.
Preview |
Text
Plasma oxalate - comparison of methodologies.pdf - Published Version Download (666kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Measurement of oxalate in the blood is essential for monitoring primary hyperoxaluria patients with progressive renal impairment and on dialysis prior to transplantation. As no external quality assurance scheme is available for this analyte, we conducted a sample exchange scheme between six laboratories specifcally involved with the investigation of primary hyperoxaluria to compare results. The methodologies compared were gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS), ion chromatography with mass spectrometry (ICMS), and enzymatic methods using oxalate oxidase and spectrophotometry. Although individual laboratories performed well in terms of reproducibility and linearity, there was poor agreement (absolute values) between centres as illustrated by a longer-term comparison of patient results from two of the participating laboratories. This situation was only partly related to diferences in calibration and mainly refected the lower recoveries seen with the ultrafltration of samples. These fndings lead us to conclude that longitudinal monitoring of primary hyperoxaluria patients with deteriorating kidney function should be performed by a single consistent laboratory and the methodology used should always be defned. In addition, plasma oxalate concentrations reported in registry studies and those associated with the risk of systemic oxalosis in published studies need to be interpreted in light of the methodology used. A reference method and external quality assurance scheme for plasma oxalate analysis would be benefcial.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Plasma oxalate: comparison of methodologies |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00240-020-01197-4 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-020-01197-4 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Keywords: | Plasma oxalate · Method comparison · Ultrafltration · Primary hyperoxaluria |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Infection and Immunity |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10119893 |




Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |