Müller, MD;
Lyrer, PA;
Brown, MM;
Bonati, LH;
(2021)
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Stroke
, 52
(1)
e3-e5.
10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030521.
Preview |
Text
Brown_Muller et al 2020 Cochrane Corner Stroke final draft.pdf - Accepted Version Download (206kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery is an important cause of stroke. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid stenosis. This review updates a previous version last published in 2012 including all randomized clinical trials comparing CAS to CEA for treatment of carotid stenosis
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis |
Location: | United States |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030521 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030521 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | carotid stenosis, endarterectomy, carotid, myocardial infarction, odds ratio, risk, stenting, stroke |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10118582 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |