Gerstenberg, O;
(2004)
What Constitutions Can Do (but Courts Sometimes Don’t): Property, Speech, and the Influence of Constitutional Norms on Private Law.
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence
, 17
(1)
pp. 61-81.
10.1017/s0841820900003817.
Preview |
Text
Gerstenb - What Constitutions can do.pdf - Published Version Download (187kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper I want to address, against the background of the ECtHR’s recent attempt to resolve the clash between property rights and the right to freedom of expression in its decision in Appleby v. UK, two questions, both of which I take to be related to the overarching theme of “social democracy”. First, there is the problem of the influence of “higher law”-of human rights norms and constitutional norms-on private law norms; second, the question of the role of adjudication in “constitutionalizing” private law, in other words, the question of the “judicial cognizability” of constitutional norms within private law.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | What Constitutions Can Do (but Courts Sometimes Don’t): Property, Speech, and the Influence of Constitutional Norms on Private Law |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1017/s0841820900003817 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900003817 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10112963 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
