Sroczynski, G;
Gogollari, A;
Kuehne, F;
Hallsson, LR;
Widschwendter, M;
Pashayan, N;
Siebert, U;
(2020)
A Systematic Review On Cost-effectiveness Studies Evaluating Ovarian Cancer Early Detection And Prevention Strategies.
Cancer Prevention Research
, 13
(5)
pp. 429-442.
10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0506.
Preview |
Text
Pashayan_Sroczynski et al -Sysematic Rev CE Oca - Ca Prev Res.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Ovarian cancer imposes a substantial health and economic burden. We systematically reviewed current health-economic evidence for ovarian cancer early-detection or prevention strategies. Accordingly, we searched relevant databases for cost-effectiveness studies evaluating ovarian cancer early-detection or prevention strategies. Study characteristics and results including quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were summarized in standardized evidence tables. Economic results were transformed into 2017 Euros. The included studies (N=33) evaluated ovarian cancer screening, risk-reducing interventions in women with heterogeneous cancer risks and genetic testing followed by risk-reducing interventions for mutation carriers. Multimodal screening with a risk-adjusted algorithm in postmenopausal women achieved ICERs of 9,800-81,400 Euros/QALY, depending on assumptions on mortality data extrapolation, costs, test performance and screening frequency. Cost-effectiveness of risk-reducing surgery in mutation carriers ranged from cost-saving to 59,000 Euros/QALY. Genetic testing plus risk-reducing interventions for mutation carriers ranged from cost-saving to 54,000 Euros/QALY in women at increased mutation risk. Our findings suggest that preventive surgery and genetic testing plus preventive surgery in women at high risk for ovarian cancer can be considered effective and cost-effective. In postmenopausal women from the general population, multimodal screening using a risk-adjusted algorithm may be cost-effective.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
