UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Seeing other perspectives: Evaluating the use of virtual and augmented reality to simulate visual impairments (OpenVisSim)

Jones, P; Somoskeöy, T; Chow-Wing-Bom, H; Crabb, DP; (2020) Seeing other perspectives: Evaluating the use of virtual and augmented reality to simulate visual impairments (OpenVisSim). NPJ Digital Medicine , 3 (32) 10.1038/s41746-020-0242-6. Green open access

[thumbnail of Chow-Wing-Bom_s41746-020-0242-6.pdf]
Preview
Text
Chow-Wing-Bom_s41746-020-0242-6.pdf - Published Version

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

Simulations of visual impairment are used to educate and inform the public. However, evidence regarding their accuracy remains lacking. Here we evaluated the effectiveness of modern digital technologies to simulate the everyday difficulties caused by glaucoma. 23 normally sighted adults performed two everyday tasks that glaucoma patients often report difficulties with: a visual search task in which participants attempted to locate a mobile phone in virtual domestic environments (virtual reality (VR)), and a visual mobility task in which participants navigated a physical, room-scale environment, while impairments were overlaid using augmented reality (AR). On some trials, a gaze-contingent simulated scotoma—generated using perimetric data from a real patient with advanced glaucoma—was presented in either the superior or inferior hemifield. The main outcome measure was task completion time. Eye and head movements were also tracked and used to assess individual differences in looking behaviors. The results showed that the simulated impairments substantially impaired performance in both the VR (visual search) and AR (visual mobility) tasks (both P < 0.001). Furthermore, and in line with previous patient data: impairments were greatest when the simulated Visual Field Loss (VFL) was inferior versus superior (P < 0.001), participants made more eye and head movements in the inferior VFL condition (P < 0.001), and participants rated the inferior VFL condition as more difficult (P < 0.001). Notably, the difference in performance between the inferior and superior conditions was almost as great as the difference between a superior VFL and no impairment at all (VR: 71%; AR: 70%). We conclude that modern digital simulators are able to replicate and objectively quantify some of the key everyday difficulties associated with visual impairments. Advantages, limitations, and possible applications of current technologies are discussed. Instructions are also given for how to freely obtain the software described (OpenVisSim).

Type: Article
Title: Seeing other perspectives: Evaluating the use of virtual and augmented reality to simulate visual impairments (OpenVisSim)
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0242-6
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0242-6
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10092260
Downloads since deposit
52Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item