Young, SJ;
(2015)
The Crystal Palace.
In: Martinsen, D and Maiorova, O, (eds.)
Dostoevsky in Context.
(pp. 176-184).
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Preview |
Text
Young_Crystal Palace_Dec 2014.pdf Download (111kB) | Preview |
Abstract
From the moment of its construction, London's Crystal Palace (Fig. 4), the iron and glass structure designed by Joseph Paxton for the 1851 Great Exhibition in Hyde Park and subsequently moved to Sydenham Hill in South London, where it stood until its destruction by fire in 1936, was subject to intense international interest and viewed as a symbol of modernity. It also became the central image of Dostoevsky's critique of western rationalism, particularly of the radicals and their utopian aspirations. His appropriation of this symbol incorporated ideas about the Crystal Palace's all-encompassing and contradictory nature that characterized its history and reception. From the original idea for the Great Exhibition in 1851 to its subsequent interpretation by historians, the meaning and use of the Crystal Palace has seen significant changes. The project, for the first world's fair, showcasing industry, manufactures, and applied arts from Britain and the rest of the world, was initially conceived as a means of shaping the image of Britain and the British Empire for the Victorian era (and, equally, of defining the image of the non-Western “other”); of promoting free trade and internationalism (and, therefore, global peace); of proclaiming the superiority of British manufactures; of defining, celebrating, and educating people about industry, manufacturing processes and products; and of bringing together different classes and cultures. Beyond the immediate designs of the royal commission that established the Great Exhibition, the palace led to material changes in Britain's infrastructure and cultural life, as the success of the Great Exhibition resulted in the establishment in London of the Science, Natural History, and Victoria and Albert Museums, Imperial College, and the Royal Albert Hall. The palace also played a crucial role not simply in representing, but in defining the very meaning of modernity, both in terms of its aesthetic form, and in relation to the changes in knowledge and behavior that modernity introduced. In particular, the Crystal Palace has been associated with concepts of the “general public” and of consumerism as spectacle. The function and aims of the reconstructed palace, which opened in Sydenham in 1854, were somewhat different. The educational focus switched from industry to the cultures of different civilizations, as visitors walked through architectural courts that took them on a trip around the world and through the ages.
Type: | Book chapter |
---|---|
Title: | The Crystal Palace |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9781139236867 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236867 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Dostoevsky, Chernyshevsky, Russian literature, Crystal Palace, London, Great Exhibition, Joseph Paxton, Henry Mayhew, Evgeny Zamiatin |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > SSEES |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10089817 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |