Martin, Alexander;
White, James;
(2021)
Vowel harmony and disharmony are not equivalent in learning.
Linguistic Inquiry
, 52
(1)
pp. 227-239.
10.1162/ling_a_00375.
Preview |
Text
MartinWhite_LI.pdf - Accepted Version Download (242kB) | Preview |
Abstract
General vowel harmony and disharmony rules have comparable formal complexity but differ dramatically in typological frequency and phonetic motivation. Previous studies found no difference in learning between vowel harmony and disharmony; this putative equivalence has been used to discount the view that learners are influenced by substantive learning biases. In the current study, we use a more nuanced test to show that there is a clear difference in learning between vowel harmony and disharmony: learners readily infer a vowel harmony pattern, but not a disharmony pattern. The findings suggest that vowel disharmony is in fact strongly disfavored during learning.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
