Canessa, S; Spitzen-van der Sluijs, A; Stark, T; Allen, B; Bishop, P; Bletz, M; Briggs, C; ... Garner, T; + view all Canessa, S; Spitzen-van der Sluijs, A; Stark, T; Allen, B; Bishop, P; Bletz, M; Briggs, C; Daversa, D; Gray, M; Griffiths, R; Harris, R; Harrison, X; Hoverman, J; Jervis, P; Muths, E; Olson, D; Price, S; Richards-Zawacki, C; Robert, J; Rosa, G; Scheele, B; Schmidt, B; Garner, T; - view fewer (2020) Conservation decisions under pressure: lessons from an exercise in rapid response to wildlife disease. Conservation Science and Practice , 2 (1) , Article e141. 10.1111/csp2.141.

Preview

Text Garner_csp2.141.pdf - Published Version Download (20MB) | Preview

Abstract

Novel outbreaks of emerging pathogens require rapid responses to enable successful mitigation. We simulated a 1‐day emergency meeting where experts were engaged to recommend mitigation strategies for a new outbreak of the amphibian fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans. Despite the inevitable uncertainty, experts suggested and discussed several possible strategies. However, their recommendations were undermined by imperfect initial definitions of the objectives and scope of management. This problem is likely to arise in most real‐world emergency situations. The exercise thus highlighted the importance of clearly defining the context, objectives, and spatial–temporal scale of mitigation decisions. Managers are commonly under pressure to act immediately. However, an iterative process in which experts and managers cooperate to clarify objectives and uncertainties, while collecting more information and devising mitigation strategies, may be slightly more time consuming but ultimately lead to better outcomes.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Archive Staff Only

View Item