Ghanouni, A;
Waller, J;
Stoffel, ST;
Vlaev, I;
von Wagner, C;
(2019)
Acceptability of risk-stratified breast screening: Effect of the order of presenting risk and benefit information.
Journal of Medical Screening
10.1177/0969141319877669.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Ghanouni_Acceptability of reduced-frequency risk-stratified breast screening 07.08.19 - For RPS.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test whether reduced-frequency risk-stratified breast screening would be perceived more favourably by transposing the order of information on benefits and risks. METHODS: After reading vignettes describing non-stratified three-yearly screening and a risk-stratified alternative with five-yearly invitations for women at low risk, 698 women completed an online survey. Participants were allocated at random to information on screening benefits followed by risks, or vice versa, and asked to state preferences for either screening system. Participants also rated perceived magnitude of screening benefits and risks, and breast cancer susceptibility. RESULTS: Binomial logistic regression did not find order effects on preferences (p = 0.533) or perceived benefits of screening (p = 0.780). Perceived screening risks were greater when risks were presented first (p < 0.0005). Greater perceived susceptibility was associated with lower proportions preferring risk-stratified screening (15% vs. 39% in highest and lowest groups; p = 0.002), as were greater perceived screening benefits (e.g. 13% vs. 45% in highest and lowest groups; p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: No information order effect on preferences was observed. Information order did affect screening risk perceptions. Efforts to improve perceptions may need to be more intensive than those tested. Women perceiving themselves as high risk or perceiving greater benefits of screening may be particularly averse to less frequent screening.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
