Lotmore, M;
(2019)
Practitioner adherence measures in multimodal interventions for complex mental illness: Development of the Open Dialogue adherence scale.
Doctoral thesis (D.Clin.Psy), UCL (University College London).
Preview |
Text
Lotmore 10084038 thesis_sig-removed.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This three-part thesis examines the role and development of practitioner adherence measures for multimodal interventions for individuals with complex mental health difficulties. Part 1: Literature Review. A systematic review of the literature on practitioner adherence measures for multimodal interventions for complex mental health conditions. Results are presented and narratively synthesized examining measure content, development and use. The review revealed the lack of consensus around measure development and highlighted the need for guidelines for researchers. Part 2: Empirical Paper. A multimodal approach to the development and psychometric formalisation of an Open Dialogue (OD) practitioner adherence measure. This research describes the process of measure development using a Modified Delphi technique as well as inter-rater reliability and internal consistency analyses. Preliminary outcomes suggest that the OD Adherence Measure is a reliable and valid way of measuring practitioner adherence to OD principles within network meetings. Future directions for measure development and use are described. Part 3: Critical Appraisal. A reflection and appraisal of the research process. This includes reasons for undertaking research in this area, challenges of working in a multisite research project and a more detailed discussion of the limitations of this work.
Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
---|---|
Qualification: | D.Clin.Psy |
Title: | Practitioner adherence measures in multimodal interventions for complex mental illness: Development of the Open Dialogue adherence scale |
Event: | UCL (University College London) |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © The Author 2019. Original content in this thesis is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Any third-party copyright material present remains the property of its respective owner(s) and is licensed under its existing terms. Access may initially be restricted at the author’s request. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10084038 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |