UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Understanding Conditional Associations between ToxCast in Vitro Readouts and the Hepatotoxicity of Compounds Using Rule-Based Methods

Mahmoud, SY; Svensson, F; Zoufir, A; Modos, D; Afzal, AM; Bender, A; (2020) Understanding Conditional Associations between ToxCast in Vitro Readouts and the Hepatotoxicity of Compounds Using Rule-Based Methods. Chemical Research in Toxicology , 33 (1) pp. 137-153. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00382. Green open access

[thumbnail of Svensson_Manuscript_14_June_hepatotoxicity.pdf]
Preview
Text
Svensson_Manuscript_14_June_hepatotoxicity.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Current in vitro models for hepatotoxicity commonly suffer from low detection rates due to incomplete coverage of bioactivity space. Additionally, in vivo exposure measures such as Cmax are used for hepatotoxicity screening which are unavailable early on. Here we propose a novel rule-based framework to extract interpretable and biologically meaningful multi-conditional associations to prioritize in vitro endpoints for hepatotoxicity and understand the associated physicochemical conditions. The data used in this study was derived for 673 compounds from 361 ToxCast bioactivity measurements and 29 calculated physicochemical properties against two lowest effective levels (LEL) of rodent hepatotoxicity from ToxRefDB, namely 15mg/kg/day and 500mg/kg/day. In order to achieve 80% coverage of toxic compounds, 35 rules with accuracies ranging from 96% to 73% using 39 unique ToxCast assays are needed at a threshold level of 500mg/kg/day, whereas to describe the same coverage at a threshold of 15mg/kg/day 20 rules with accuracies of between 98% and 81% were needed, comprising 24 unique assays. Despite the 33-fold difference in dose levels, we found relative consistency in the key mechanistic groups in rule clusters, namely i) activities against Cytochrome P, ii) immunological responses, and iii) nuclear receptor activities. Less specific effects, such as oxidative stress and cell cycle arrest, were used more by rules to describe toxicity at the level of 500mg/kg/day. Although the endocrine disruption through nuclear receptor activity formulated an essential cluster of rules, this bioactivity is not covered in four commercial assay setups for hepatotoxicity. Using an external set of 29 drugs with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) labels, we found promiscuity over important assays discriminates between compounds with different levels of liver injury. In vitro-in vivo associations were also improved by incorporating physicochemical properties especially for the potent, 15mg/kg/day toxicity level, as well for assays describing nuclear receptor activity and phenotypic changes. The most frequently used physicochemical properties, predictive for hepatotoxicity in combination with assay activities, are linked to bioavailability, which were the number of rotatable bonds (less than 7) at a of level of 15mg/kg/day, and the number of rings (of less than 3) at level of 500mg/kg/day. In summary, hepatotoxicity cannot very well be captured by single assay endpoints, but better by a combination of bioactivities in relevant assays, with the likelihood of hepatotoxicity increasing with assay promiscuity. Together these findings can be used to prioritize assay combinations which are appropriate to assess potential hepatotoxicity.

Type: Article
Title: Understanding Conditional Associations between ToxCast in Vitro Readouts and the Hepatotoxicity of Compounds Using Rule-Based Methods
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00382
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00382
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Anatomy, Peptides and proteins, Assays, Toxicity, Bioactivity
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Department of Neuromuscular Diseases
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10080506
Downloads since deposit
140Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item