Squires, JE;
Graham, I;
Bashir, K;
Nadalin-Penno, L;
Lavis, J;
Francis, J;
Curran, J;
... Hutchinson, AM; + view all
(2019)
Understanding context: A concept analysis.
Journal of Advanced Nursing
, 75
(12)
pp. 3448-3470.
10.1111/jan.14165.
Preview |
Text
Squires_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Advanced_Nursing.pdf - Accepted Version Download (862kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Aims To conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) in healthcare. Background Context is increasingly recognized as important to the development, delivery and understanding of implementation strategies; however, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is lacking. Design Modified Walker and Avant concept analysis comprised of 5 steps: 1) concept selection; 2) determination of aims; 3) identification of uses of context; 4) determination of its defining attributes; and 5) definition of its empirical referents. Methods A wide range of databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2014. Empirical articles were included if a definition and/or attributes of context were reported. Theoretical articles were included if they reported a model, theory, or framework of context or where context was a component. Double independent screening and data extraction was conducted. Analysis was iterative, involving organizing and reorganizing until a framework of domains, attributes and features of context emerged. Result We identified 15,972 references, of which 70 satisfied our inclusion criteria. In total, 201 unique features of context were identified, of these 89 were shared (reported in 2 or more studies). The 89 shared features were grouped into 21 attributes of context which were further categorized into 6 domains of context. Conclusion This study resulted in a framework of domains, attributes and features of context. These attributes and features, if assessed and used to tailor implementation activities, hold promise for improved research implementation in clinical practice.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
