UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Delegated Updates in Epistemic Graphs for Opponent Modelling

Hunter, A; Potyka, N; Polberg, S; (2019) Delegated Updates in Epistemic Graphs for Opponent Modelling. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 113 pp. 207-244. 10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006. Green open access

[thumbnail of epistemic_meta_elsevier_v2.pdf]
Preview
Text
epistemic_meta_elsevier_v2.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (596kB) | Preview

Abstract

In an epistemic graph, belief in arguments is represented by probability distributions. Furthermore, the influence that belief in arguments can have on the belief in other arguments is represented by constraints on the probability distributions. Different agents may choose different constraints to describe their reasoning, thus making epistemic graphs extremely flexible tools. A key application for epistemic graphs is modelling participants in persuasion dialogues, with the aim of modelling the change in beliefs as each move in the dialogue is made. This requires mechanisms for updating the model throughout the dialogue. In this paper, we introduce the class of delegated update methods, which harness existing, simpler update methods in order to produce more realistic outputs. In particular, we focus on hypothesized updates, which capture agent’s reluctance or susceptibility to belief updates that can be caused by certain factors, such as time of the day, fatigue, dialogue length, and more. We provide a comprehensive range of options for modelling different kinds of agents and we explore a range of properties for categorising the options.

Type: Article
Title: Delegated Updates in Epistemic Graphs for Opponent Modelling
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: probabilistic argumentation, epistemic argumentation, epistemic updates
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10078591
Downloads since deposit
45Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item