Treleaven, P;
Barnett, J;
Koshiyama, A;
(2019)
Algorithms: Law and Regulations.
Computer
, 52
(2)
pp. 32-40.
10.1109/MC.2018.2888774.
Preview |
Text
Treleaven_Algorithms. Law and Regulations_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version Download (846kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The legal status of AI and algorithms continues to be debated. Resume-sifting algorithms exhibit unethical, discriminatory, and illegal behavior; crime-sentencing algorithms are unable to justify their decisions; and autonomous vehicles' predictive analytics software will make life and death decisions.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Algorithms: Law and Regulations |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1109/MC.2018.2888774 |
Publisher version: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8672418/keywo... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Law, Artificial intelligence, Heuristic algorithms, Google, Prediction algorithms, Ethics |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10076036 |




Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |