UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Cancer worry frequency vs. intensity and self-reported colorectal cancer screening uptake: A population-based study

Vrinten, C; Stoffel, S; Dodd, RH; Waller, J; Lyratzopoulos, Y; von Wagner, C; Cancer worry frequency vs. intensity and self-reported colorectal cancer screening uptake: A population-based study. Journal of Medical Screening 10.1177/0969141319842331. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of 0969141319842331.pdf]
Preview
Text
0969141319842331.pdf - Published Version

Download (145kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: Many studies of cancer worry use items measuring frequency or intensity. Little is known about how each of these relate to cancer screening uptake. This study compared the association between worry frequency vs. intensity and colorectal cancer screening intention/uptake. Methods: Across four surveys (2014–2016), we collected data from 2878 screening-eligible men and women (aged 60–70) in England. Measures included single-items assessing cancer worry frequency and intensity, and a derived combination of both. We also assessed self-reported past faecal occult blood testing uptake (ever vs. never), intention to participate when next invited (yes vs. no), and demographics. Using logistic regression, we compared a model containing sociodemographic characteristics (Model 1), with four models adding cancer worry frequency (Model 2), intensity (Model 3), both (Model 4), or the combined measure (Model 5). Results: A model with cancer worry intensity and demographics (Model 3) explained significantly more variance in uptake and intention (R2 ¼ 0.068 and 0.062, respectively) than demographics alone (Model 1: R2 ¼ 0.058 and 0.042; p < 0.001), or a model with demographics and cancer worry frequency (Model 2: R2 ¼ 0.059 and 0.052; p < 0.001). The model was also equally as effective as models including both the frequency and intensity items (Model 4: R2¼ 0.070 n.s. and 0.062 n.s.), or using the derived combination of both (Model 5: R2 ¼ 0.063 n.s. and 0.053 n.s.). Conclusion: A single item measure of cancer worry intensity appeared to be most parsimonious for explaining variance in colorectal cancer screening intention and uptake

Type: Article
Title: Cancer worry frequency vs. intensity and self-reported colorectal cancer screening uptake: A population-based study
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/0969141319842331
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141319842331
Language: English
Additional information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: Cancer, fear, worry, anxiety, colorectal cancer, screening, faecal occult blood test
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Epidemiology and Public Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10073789
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item