Belur, J;
Agnew-Pauley, W;
McGinley, B;
Tompson, L;
A Systematic Review of Police Recruit Training Programmes.
Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice
10.1093/police/paz022.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Belur Systematic Review Revised v2 for Peer Review.pdf - Accepted Version Download (227kB) | Preview |
Abstract
An evidence-based approach to guide the proposed changes to recruit police training under the Police Education Qualifications Framework (PEQF) in England and Wales requires that changes be grounded in the available evidence on what works in recruit training. This systematic review is a synthesis of primary evidence on police academies, field training, and how police recruits learn. The purpose of the review is to learn from the evidence to inform the development of a graduate level training programme in England and Wales. The review, inspired by a realist approach, includes a total of 33 studies conducted in a number of countries. Key training contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes were examined to determine how training works, under what conditions, and for whom. Findings indicate that student-centred teaching approaches were found to promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Recruits preferred practical, hands-on training over theoretical lessons, and field training was consistently shown to have a positive impact on the process of transforming recruits from civilians into police officers. Finally, the role of academic and field training tutors was found to be of critical importance for recruits in integrating theoretical learning with practical skills. Policy implications for the UK College of Policing and police forces implementing the PEQF are discussed.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | A Systematic Review of Police Recruit Training Programmes |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1093/police/paz022 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paz022 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Security and Crime Science |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10073068 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |