UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents

Lewis, C; Riddington, M; Hill, M; Arthurs, OJ; Hutchinson, JC; Chitty, LS; Bevan, C; ... Sebire, NJ; + view all (2019) Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology , 126 (6) pp. 745-753. 10.1111/1471-0528.15591. Green open access

[thumbnail of Lewis_et_al-2018-BJOG__An_International_Journal_of_Obstetrics_&_Gynaecology.pdf]
Preview
Text
Lewis_et_al-2018-BJOG__An_International_Journal_of_Obstetrics_&_Gynaecology.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (782kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether less invasive methods of autopsy would be acceptable to bereaved parents and likely to increase uptake. DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: Bereaved parents recruited prospectively across seven hospitals in England and retrospectively through four parent support organisations. SAMPLE: 859 surveys and 20 interviews with bereaved parents. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey and qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likely uptake, preferences, factors impacting decision-making, views on different autopsy methods. RESULTS: Overall, 90.5% of participants indicated they would consent to some form of less invasive autopsy (either minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), non-invasive autopsy (NIA) or both). 53.8% would consent to standard autopsy, 74.3% to MIA and 77.3% to NIA. Regarding parental preferences, 45.5% preferred MIA, 30.8% preferred NIA and 14.3% preferred standard autopsy. Participants who indicated they would decline standard autopsy but would consent to a less invasive option were significantly more likely to have a lower educational level (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.35-0.70; p=0.000062). Qualitative findings suggest parents value NIA because of the lack of any incision and MIA is considered a good compromise as it enables tissue sampling whilst easing the parental burden associated with consenting to standard autopsy. CONCLUSION: Less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience. Further health economic, validation and implementation studies are now required to assess the viability of offering these in routine widespread clinical care. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Type: Article
Title: Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15591
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15591
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: autopsy, consent, fetal, less invasive, perinatal, post-mortem, preference, prenatal, uptake
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Developmental Neurosciences Dept
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Genetics and Genomic Medicine Dept
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10065876
Downloads since deposit
48Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item