Timmerman, Richard Martin;
(2018)
Customisation and urban design: evaluating the role of informal street user modifications in the distribution of static activities and perceptions of streetscape settings.
Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London).
Preview |
Text
Timmerman_10063471_thesis_id_redacted.pdf Download (28MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since the mid-twentieth century, the urban planning and design practices have battled to counter their association with the creation of dead urban spaces. This deadness is conveyed in their lack of pedestrian activities – conviviality, spatial interactions – and negative perceptions of such spaces. In a variety of ways, urban design theorists have suggested that the negative impressions of planning are connected to the system’s inability to acknowledge the opinions of those subjected to it. The process of producing public spaces often result in inflexible scenarios that fail to acknowledge constantly changing end-user requirements. In several narratives, planning processes are compared to the monotony of mass-production processes – a linear process that limits participation and variety in designs by their end-users. Today, manufacturing processes offer mass-customisation as an approach towards diversifying end products, devolving design powers to customers who informally modify and optimise their products. Mass-customisation allows for end-user modifications throughout a product’s creation and post-construction. While collaborative design is embedded into many urban design processes, comparable flexibilities and successes observed in mass-customisation are not apparent. Through the empirical study of three London retail high streets, with contrasting population demographics, the impacts of informally customised streetscape features on the distribution of static pedestrian activities are scrutinised. Evidence is tested against the opinions of a selection of pedestrians distributed in streetscape regions with varying intensities of customisation. This research finds that an increased presence of customisation results in increased pedestrian activities, vitality, and positive spatial perceptions. It also finds that there is an optimal level of complexity associated with informal modifications, corresponding with past studies concerning the negative impacts of over complexity on human responses to spatial settings – a theoretical threshold. Therefore, moderate implementations of customisation are linked to the increased clustering of static activities and satisfaction across varied demographics and spatial settings.
Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
---|---|
Qualification: | Ph.D |
Title: | Customisation and urban design: evaluating the role of informal street user modifications in the distribution of static activities and perceptions of streetscape settings |
Event: | UCL (University College London) |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © The Author 2018. Original content in this thesis is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Any third-party copyright material present remains the property of its respective owner(s) and is licensed under its existing terms. Access may initially be restricted at the author’s request. |
Keywords: | Customisation, Urban Design, Informality, Pedestrian behaviours, Human response, Visual complexity, Self-organisation, Self-regulation, Devolution, Streetscapes, Vibrancy, Vitality |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > The Bartlett School of Planning |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10063471 |




Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |