UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

'The Loud Dissenter and its Cautious Partner' - Russia, China, global governance and humanitarian intervention

Snetkov, A; Lanteigne, M; (2014) 'The Loud Dissenter and its Cautious Partner' - Russia, China, global governance and humanitarian intervention. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific , 15 (1) pp. 113-146. 10.1093/irap/lcu018. Green open access

[thumbnail of Snetkov revised IRAP paper.pdf]
Preview
Text
Snetkov revised IRAP paper.pdf

Download (184kB) | Preview

Abstract

The global issue of humanitarian intervention has become more pronounced and complicated in recent years due to increasingly diverging views on addressing security crises between the West on one side and Russia and China on the other. Despite their support for the principles of ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P), both Russia and China are wary of Western intervention in internal conflicts after the Cold War and have become increasingly critical of Western-led armed intervention in humanitarian conflicts. Unease in Beijing and Moscow over the multilateral intervention in the 2011 Libyan conflict and their ongoing opposition to Western policies in the Syrian Civil War since 2011 would seem to point to ever more coincidence in their negative views of American and Western intervention policies. A conventional wisdom has thus emerged that there is something akin to a Sino–Russian ‘bloc’, with near-identical policies of discouraging armed intervention within state borders under the aegis of humanitarian intervention or the R2P doctrine, signed in 2005 (2005 World Summit). However, closer examination of Russian and Chinese positions on the Libyan and Syrian conflicts, drawing on normative and identity perspectives, reveals significant differences in how both states address intervention in civil conflicts involving human rights emergencies. Indeed, the Libyan and Syrian cases suggest that the distance between the two states on ‘acceptable’ policies toward international intervention in civil conflicts may actually be increasing. While Russia has assumed the role of the ‘loud dissenter’ in global dialogs on humanitarian intervention, China has opted for the position of a ‘cautious partner’.

Type: Article
Title: 'The Loud Dissenter and its Cautious Partner' - Russia, China, global governance and humanitarian intervention
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/irap/lcu018
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcu018
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Social Sciences, International Relations, RISING POWERS, COTE-DIVOIRE, RESPONSIBILITY, PROTECT, POLICY, LIBYA
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > SSEES
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10061714
Downloads since deposit
192Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item