UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

Sarker, S-J; Smith, SK; Chowdhury, K; Ganz, PA; Zimmerman, S; Gribben, J; Korszun, A; (2017) Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Support Care Cancer , 25 (3) pp. 739-748. 10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1. Green open access

[thumbnail of Comparison of impact.pdf]
Preview
Text
Comparison of impact.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to examine quality of life, using the Impact of Cancer version 2 (IOCv2), in British non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors and investigate differences between survivors in the UK and the USA. METHODS: NHL survivors (326 UK and 667 US) completed the 37-item IOCv2 and psychological distress, fatigue and social support questionnaires. RESULTS: The IOCv2 showed good reliability in the British sample with higher internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.7-0.9) and no floor and ceiling effects. UK survivors showed significantly higher negative (p < 0.001) and higher positive (p = 0.003) IOC compared to US survivors. Younger survivors (p = 0.003), those with shorter time since diagnosis (p < 0.001) and with lower levels of social support (p = 0.001), showed more negative IOC in both groups. Higher negative IOC was also significantly associated with fatigue (p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (p < 0.001) in both countries. Higher positive IOC was associated with female gender (p < 0.001), longer time since diagnosis (p = 0.02), those diagnosed at later stage (p < 0.05) and with greater social support (p = 0.004). Whereas significantly lower positive IOC was associated with white ethnicity (p < 0.001), higher education levels (p < 0.05) and fatigue (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IOCv2 is reliable and applicable in UK and US populations. Both negative and positive IOC scores were higher in British compared to US survivors. However, in both countries, psychosocial factors consistently showed the greatest impact on QOL irrespective of clinical characteristics. Recognition and treatment of individuals with these risk factors is a high priority for improving QOL in long-term cancer survivors, as is the development of modular interventions aimed at increasing positive IOC as well as decreasing negative impact. The IOCv2 shows great potential both as a screening and assessment measure for examining cancer-related outcomes among survivors.

Type: Article
Title: Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors
Location: Germany
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Cancer survivors, Depression, Impact of cancer scale, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Quality of life, Social support, Aged, Female, Humans, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Factors, Social Support, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors, United Kingdom, United States
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060657
Downloads since deposit
71Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item