UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

“Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta‐analysis”

Fusaroli, R; Lambrechts, A; Bang, D; Bowler, DM; Gaigg, SB; (2017) “Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta‐analysis”. Autism Research , 10 (3) pp. 384-407. 10.1002/aur.1678.

[thumbnail of Bang_Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis_AAM.pdf] Text
Bang_Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff

Download (13MB)

Abstract

Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) tend to show distinctive, atypical acoustic patterns of speech. These behaviors affect social interactions and social development and could represent a non‐invasive marker for ASD. We systematically reviewed the literature quantifying acoustic patterns in ASD. Search terms were: (prosody OR intonation OR inflection OR intensity OR pitch OR fundamental frequency OR speech rate OR voice quality OR acoustic) AND (autis* OR Asperger). Results were filtered to include only: empirical studies quantifying acoustic features of vocal production in ASD, with a sample size >2, and the inclusion of a neurotypical comparison group and/or correlations between acoustic measures and severity of clinical features. We identified 34 articles, including 30 univariate studies and 15 multivariate machine‐learning studies. We performed meta‐analyses of the univariate studies, identifying significant differences in mean pitch and pitch range between individuals with ASD and comparison participants (Cohen's d of 0.4–0.5 and discriminatory accuracy of about 61–64%). The multivariate studies reported higher accuracies than the univariate studies (63–96%). However, the methods used and the acoustic features investigated were too diverse for performing meta‐analysis. We conclude that multivariate studies of acoustic patterns are a promising but yet unsystematic avenue for establishing ASD markers. We outline three recommendations for future studies: open data, open methods, and theory‐driven research. Autism Res 2017, 10: 384–407. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Type: Article
Title: “Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta‐analysis”
DOI: 10.1002/aur.1678
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1678
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: voice, speech, acoustic properties, machine learning, biomaker
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Imaging Neuroscience
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10056031
Downloads since deposit
2Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item