Leichsenring, F;
Abbass, A;
Hilsenroth, MJ;
Luyten, P;
Munder, T;
Rabung, S;
Steinert, C;
(2018)
"Gold Standards," Plurality and Monocultures: The Need for Diversity in Psychotherapy.
Frontiers in Psychiatry
, 9
, Article 159. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00159.
Preview |
Text
fpsyt-09-00159.pdf - Published Version Download (371kB) | Preview |
Abstract
For psychotherapy of mental disorders, presently several approaches are available, such as interpersonal, humanistic, systemic, psychodynamic or cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Pointing to the available evidence, proponents of CBT claim that CBT is the gold standard. Some authors even argue for an integrated CBT-based form of psychotherapy as the only form of psychotherapy. CBT undoubtedly has its strengths and CBT researchers have to be credited for developing and testing treatments for many mental disorders. A critical review, however, shows that the available evidence for the theoretical foundations of CBT, assumed mechanisms of change, quality of studies, and efficacy is not as robust as some researchers claim. Most important, there is no consistent evidence that CBT is more efficacious than other evidence-based approaches. These findings do not justify regarding CBT as the gold standard psychotherapy. They even provide less justification for the idea that the future of psychotherapy lies in one integrated CBT-based form of psychotherapy as the only type of psychotherapy. For the different psychotherapeutic approaches a growing body of evidence is available. These approaches have their strengths because of differences in their respective focus on interpersonal relationships, affects, cognitions, systemic perspectives, experiential, or unconscious processes. Different approaches may be suitable to different patients and therapists. As generally assumed, progress in research results from openness to new ideas and learning from diverse perspectives. Thus, different forms of evidence-based psychotherapy are required. Plurality is the future of psychotherapy, not a uniform “one fits all” approach.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | "Gold Standards," Plurality and Monocultures: The Need for Diversity in Psychotherapy |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00159 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00159 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2018 Leichsenring, Abbass, Hilsenroth, Luyten, Munder, Rabung and Steinert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
Keywords: | Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Psychiatry, psychotherapy, gold standard, efficacy, evidence, cognitive-behavior therapy, COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY, BONA-FIDE PSYCHOTHERAPIES, ANXIETY DISORDERS, INTERPERSONAL PSYCHOTHERAPY, CONTROLLED-TRIALS, PSYCHODYNAMIC THERAPY, MAJOR DEPRESSION, UNIFIED PROTOCOL, OUTCOME RESEARCH, CLINICAL-TRIAL |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10048567 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |