UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

Wodarg, F; Turner, EL; Dobson, J; Ringleb, PA; Mali, WP; Fraedrich, G; Chatellier, G; ... Carotid Stenosis Trialists’ Collaboration, .; + view all (2018) Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery , 10 (12) pp. 1149-1154. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013622. Green open access

[thumbnail of Wodarg_Influence_stent_design.pdf]
Preview
Text
Wodarg_Influence_stent_design.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (288kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Wodarg_Influence_stent_design_Suppl.pdf]
Preview
Text
Wodarg_Influence_stent_design_Suppl.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (81kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background and purpose: Carotid artery stenting is an alternative to endarterectomy for the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis but was associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Technical aspects of treatment may partly explain these results. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the influence of technical aspects such as stent design or the use of protection devices, as well as clinical variables, on procedural risk. / Methods: We pooled data of 1557 individual patients receiving stent treatment in three large RCTs comparing stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The primary outcome event was any procedural stroke or death occurring within 30 days after stenting. / Results: Procedural stroke or death occurred significantly more often with the use of open-cell stents (61/595 patients, 10.3%) than with closed-cell stents (58/962 patients, 6.0%; RR 1.76; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; P=0.002). Procedural stroke or death occurred in 76/950 patients (8.0%) treated with protection devices (predominantly distal filters) and in 43/607 (7.1%) treated without protection devices (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.70; P=0.67). Clinical variables predicting the primary outcome event were age, severity of the qualifying event, history of prior stroke, and level of disability at baseline. The effect of stent design remained similar after adjustment for these variables. / Conclusions: In symptomatic carotid stenosis, the use of stents with a closed-cell design is independently associated with a lower risk of procedural stroke or death compared with open-cell stents. Filter-type protection devices do not appear to reduce procedural risk.

Type: Article
Title: Influence of stent design and use of protection devices on outcome of carotid artery stenting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013622
Publisher version: https://jnis.bmj.com/content/early/2018/04/19/neur...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: carotid artery stenting, plaque, protection system, stent design, stent optimization
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10047819
Downloads since deposit
424Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item