McDowall, WAS;
(2018)
Disruptive innovation and energy transitions: Is Christensen’s theory helpful?
Energy Research and Social Science
, 37
pp. 243-246.
10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.049.
Preview |
Text
McDowall 2018 - ERSS Disruptive Innovation_aam.pdf - Accepted Version Download (436kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Clayton Christensen’s term, ‘disruptive innovation’ has become widespread. Unfortunately, Christensen’s theory relies on far too narrow a conception of both disruption and innovation to be a central framework for thinking about low-carbon transitions. It is better understood as describing one specific mechanism of technological and industrial change that contributes to a broader framework of understanding transitions. It should also be understood as a warning and reminder: businesses, policy analysts and energy modellers alike are prone to overlook potential shifts in user demands, and the technological changes that chase and enable them.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Disruptive innovation and energy transitions: Is Christensen’s theory helpful? |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.049 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.049 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Innovation; Energy transitions; Energy modelling |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > Bartlett School Env, Energy and Resources |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10031915 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |