Reiss, M;
(2014)
What place does science have in an aims-based curriculum?
School Science Review
, 95
(352)
pp. 9-14.
Preview |
Text
ssr_march_2014_009_014_reiss.pdf - Accepted Version Download (248kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I argue that school curriculum development should start with aims rather than with subjects and that the fundamental aims of school education should be to enable each learner to lead a life that is personally flourishing and to help others to do so too. These overarching aims give rise to more specific ones by considering how human flourishing requires such things as the acquisition of a broad background understanding, moral education, a life of imagination and reflection, and preparation for work. This approach would result in a school science education that had similarities with much current school education, which is desirable as it suggests that the approach is not completely unrealistic, but some non-trivial differences too, which is desirable as it suggests that the approach does not simply replicate existing approaches.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | What place does science have in an aims-based curriculum? |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10024041 |
Loading...
Loading...Loading...| 1. |  United States | 15 |
| 2. |  China | 12 |
| 3. |  United Kingdom | 6 |
| 4. |  Slovenia | 4 |
| 5. |  Turkey | 2 |
| 6. |  Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 |
| 7. |  India | 1 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
