Reimers, S.;
(2009)
A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and
progressive taxation.
(ELSE Working Papers
349).
ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution: London, UK.
Preview |
PDF
18897.pdf Download (213kB) |
Abstract
Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public’s taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences for progressiveness depend on the framing of the question asked. Participants indicated how they would share a fixed tax burden between two individuals who earned different amounts of money, either by adjusting the amount of tax paid by the two individuals, or by adjusting the amount of post-tax income retained. The units in which tax was described — amount of money or percentage tax rate—were manipulated orthogonally. There was a strong metric effect: Participants favored progressiveness more when tax was described as a percentage rather than amount. However, there was also a clear interaction: for amounts, participants favored progressiveness significantly more when considering post-tax money retained rather than tax paid; for percentages, no such effect was found.
Type: | Working / discussion paper |
---|---|
Title: | A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | http://else.econ.ucl.ac.uk/newweb/papers.php#2009 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Tax, framing, psychology, judgment, heuristics, biases |
UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/18897 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |