Killaspy, H;
Bebbington, P;
Blizard, R;
Johnson, S;
Nolan, F;
Pilling, S;
King, M;
(2006)
The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London.
British medical Journal
, 332
(7545)
815 - 818A.
10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C.
Preview |
Text
Bebbington_REACT.pdf Download (123kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective To compare outcomes of care from assertive community treatment teams with care by community menial health teams for people with serious mental illnesses.Design Non-blind randomised controlled trial.Setting Two inner London boroughs.Participants 251 men and women under the care of adult secondary mental health services with recent high use of inpatient care and difficulties engaging with community services.Interventions Treatment from assertive community treatment team (127 participants) or Continuation of care from community mental health team (124 participants).Main outcome measures Primary outcome was inpatient bed use 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, social function, client satisfaction, and engagement with services.Results No significant differences were found in inpatient bed use (median difference 1, 95% confidence interval -16 to 38) or in clinical or social outcomes For the two treatment groups. Clients who received care from the assertive community team seemed better engaged (adapted homeless engagement acceptance schedule: difference in means 1.1, 1.0 to 1.9), and those who agreed to be interviewed were more satisfied with services (adapted client satisfaction questionnaire: difference in means 7.14, 0.9 to 13.4).Conclusions Community mental health teams are able to support people with serious mental illnesses as effectively as assertive community treatment teams, but assertive community treatment may be better at engaging clients and may lead to greater satisfaction with services.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
