UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Can science writing collectives overcome barriers to more democratic communication and collaboration? Lessons from environmental communication praxis in southern Appalachia

Burke, B; Welch-Devine, M; Gustafson, JS; Heynen, N; Rice, JL; Gragson, TL; Evans, S; (2016) Can science writing collectives overcome barriers to more democratic communication and collaboration? Lessons from environmental communication praxis in southern Appalachia. Environmental Communication , 10 (2) 10.1080/17524032.2014.999695. Green open access

[thumbnail of Burke et al 2016 Environmental Communication.pdf]
Preview
Text
Burke et al 2016 Environmental Communication.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (348kB) | Preview

Abstract

Despite compelling reasons to involve nonscientists in the production of ecological knowledge, cultural and institutional factors often dis-incentivize engagement between scientists and nonscientists. This paper details our efforts to develop a biweekly newspaper column to increase communication between ecological scientists, social scientists, and the communities within which they work. Addressing community-generated topics and written by a collective of social and natural scientists, the column is meant to foster public dialog about socio-environmental issues and to lay the groundwork for the coproduction of environmental knowledge. Our collective approach to writing addresses some major barriers to public engagement by scientists, but the need to insert ourselves as intermediaries limits these gains. Overall, our efforts at environmental communication praxis have not generated significant public debate, but they have supported future coproduction by making scientists a more visible presence in the community and providing easy pathways for them to begin engaging the public. Finally, this research highlights an underappreciated barrier to public engagement: scientists are not merely disconnected from the public, but also connected in ways that may be functional for their research. Many field scientists, for example, seek out neutral and narrowly defined connections that permit research access but are largely incompatible with efforts to address controversial issues of environmental governance.

Type: Article
Title: Can science writing collectives overcome barriers to more democratic communication and collaboration? Lessons from environmental communication praxis in southern Appalachia
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2014.999695
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.999695
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Environmental Communication on 27 January 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17524032.2014.999695
Keywords: science writing, democratization, public engagement, journalism, coproduction
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Geography
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1540021
Downloads since deposit
76Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item