Payongsri, P;
Steadman, D;
Hailes, HC;
Dalby, PA;
(2015)
Second generation engineering of transketolase for polar aromatic aldehyde substrates.
Enzyme and Microbial Technology
, 71
pp. 45-52.
10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.01.008.
![[thumbnail of pre-proof Second Generation Engineering TK EMT v8revised.pdf]](https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) Preview |
Text
pre-proof Second Generation Engineering TK EMT v8revised.pdf Available under License : See the attached licence file. Download (1MB) |
Preview |
Text
Dalby_Supplementary%20Data%20EMT%20v8%20_template.pdf Download (328kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Transketolase has significant industrial potential for the asymmetric synthesis of carboncarbon bonds with new chiral centres. Variants evolved on propanal were found previously with nascent activity on polar aromatic aldehydes 3-formylbenzoic acid (3-FBA), 4-formylbenzoic acid (4-FBA), and 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde (3-HBA), suggesting a potential novel route to analogues of chloramphenicol. Here we evolved improved transketolase activities towards aromatic aldehydes, by saturation mutagenesis of two active-site residues (R358 and S385), predicted to interact with the aromatic substituents. S385 variants selectively controlled the aromatic substrate preference, with up to 13-fold enhanced activities, and KM values comparable to those of natural substrates with wild-type transketolase. S385E even completely removed the substrate inhibition for 3-FBA, observed in all previous variants. The mechanisms of catalytic improvement were both mutation type and substrate dependent. S385E improved 3-FBA activity via kcat, but reduced 4-FBA activity via KM. Conversely, S385Y/T improved 3-FBA activity via KM and 4-FBA activity via kcat. This suggested that both substrate proximity and active-site orientation are very sensitive to mutation. Comparison of all variant activities on each substrate indicated different binding modes for the three aromatic substrates, supported by computational docking. This highlights a potential divergence in the evolution of different substrate specificities, with implications for enzyme engineering.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
