UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Reporting of Statistical Results in Prosthodontic and Implantology Journals: P Values or Confidence Intervals?

Kloukos, D; Papageorgiou, SN; Fleming, PS; Petridis, H; Pandis, N; (2014) Reporting of Statistical Results in Prosthodontic and Implantology Journals: P Values or Confidence Intervals? International Journal Of Prosthodontics , 27 (5) pp. 427-432. 10.11607/ijp.4011.

[img] Text
Kloukos_reporting_of_statistical_results_in_prosthodontic.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff

Download (131kB)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Confidence intervals (CIs) are integral to the interpretation of the precision and clinical relevance of research findings. The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of reporting of CIs in leading prosthodontic and dental implantology journals and to explore possible factors associated with improved reporting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty issues of nine journals in prosthodontics and implant dentistry were accessed, covering the years 2005 to 2012: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, The International Journal of Prosthodontics, The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, Implant Dentistry, and Journal of Dentistry. Articles were screened and the reporting of CIs and P values recorded. Other information including study design, region of authorship, involvement of methodologists, and ethical approval was also obtained. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with reporting of CIs. RESULTS: Interrater agreement for the data extraction performed was excellent (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.87 to 0.89). CI reporting was limited, with mean reporting across journals of 14%. CI reporting was associated with journal type, study design, and involvement of a methodologist or statistician. CONCLUSIONSS: Reporting of CI in implant dentistry and prosthodontic journals requires improvement. Improved reporting will aid appraisal of the clinical relevance of research findings by providing a range of values within which the effect size lies, thus giving the end user the opportunity to interpret the results in relation to clinical practice.

Type: Article
Title: Reporting of Statistical Results in Prosthodontic and Implantology Journals: P Values or Confidence Intervals?
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4011
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4011
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > Restorative Dental Sciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1447869
Downloads since deposit
1Download
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item